The Ohio Board of Professional Conduct has filed reports with the Supreme Court of Ohio recommending the imposition of discipline against three Ohio attorneys.

Parties will have an opportunity to file objections to the Board’s reports and recommendations with the Supreme Court. If a party files objections, the Supreme Court will schedule the case for oral argument. Objections are not permitted in consent-to-discipline matters.

Additional information about each case, including the report and recommendation, may be obtained by clicking on the Supreme Court case number.

Cuyahoga County

Cleveland Metro. Bar Associations v. Erik Shannon Keister (consent-to-discipline)
Supreme Court Case No. 2025-0481
Recommended sanction: Public reprimand

Franklin County

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sterling Everard Gill II
Supreme Court Case No. 2025-0483
Recommended sanction: Two-year suspension, stayed

Out-of-State

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ronald Coleman Taylor, Jr.
Supreme Court Case No. 2025-0482
Recommended sanction: Eighteen-month suspension, one year stayed